A HOMEOSTATIC MODEL
While the aforementioned observations and studies may seem in-teresting and cogent, the
need became apparent to us for them to be more adequately synthesized within a
comprehensive model that also took into account repetitive family patterns and
systemic thinking. Up to that point, of course, several attempts had
been made to conceptualize drug abuse as a family phenomenon. For example, Alexander and Dibb2 viewed addiction as
stabilizing the family, while Noone and
Reddir regarded the family as -stuck- at a stage in the developmental life cycle as a result of unresolved
family loyalties and grief.'9 Reillyug
saw the issues of loss, mourning, and separation anxiety in the family as perpetuating the pattern of drug abuse. However, these conceptualizations tended to be
linear in their view of causality, that is, to take the form -A leads
to B,- or -A and B lead to C.- This
contrasts with a nonlinear or -recursive-1' notion of -A leads to B, B leads to C, and C leads back to A.-
In fact, the majority of theoreticians
in this area, with the exception of Huberty,'° regarded the addiction process in linear causal terms,
rather than involving a complex set
of feedback mechanisms within a repetitive cycle. For example, one can view a parent or even the whole family
as -causing-the addiction and still be
tied to a linear model. In the remainder of this chapter, the homeostatic aspects of addiction receive particular emphasis, and the previously described elements are
incorporated as to their respective
roles in the maintenance of behavior cycles.
The model presented here includes some concepts
and ways of thinking about drug abuse-addiction and about people and their behavior that have not been
a primary part of the epistemology in the drug-abuse field. In some
ways they are discontinuous with traditional notions. They stem from a
theoretical tradition extending at least from the earlier works on
family homeostasis and triadic systems of Jackson''," and Haley.6",61
For those to whom they are unfamiliar, we ask that these ideas be
approached with an open mind and, perhaps, with a sense of exploration.