Memory etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Memory etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

MONITORING OF PROGRESS AND PROCEDURES

16 Mayıs
MONITORING OF PROGRESS AND PROCEDURES

There were at least two areas in which the AFP had interesting effects on the DDTC. The first of these concerned the monitoring of urine reports. Progress and changes in drug taking were a key part of family therapy. Clear contingencies were established for -dirty- urines given by family (and movie) therapy cases—especially in the two -paid-conditions. The treatment was sharply focused on this behavior. Thus it was essential that the urinalysis results processed at DDTC be obtained and recorded accurately and efficiently. In the early stages of the program, however, it was discovered that the DDTC was going through a -slippage phase'' regarding strict adherence to urine test results: records were sometimes -lost,- patients were able to get away with denying that dirty urines were their own, and (previously firm) established rules preventing clients with dirty urines from obtaining certain privileges, or even remaining in the program, were not being strictly followed. The AFP attention to, and insistance on, (1) clarity and efficiency of urinalysis results, and (2) adherance to program strictures based on urine results highlighted areas where slack had set in. As a result, the DDTC tightened up its urine-monitoring procedure and the total urine-reporting system was improved.*
Paralleling the above, a number of areas were uncovered by the AFP in which patients were finding it easy to manipulate the DDTC system. These included ways of getting around program rules, tricks for obtaining permission from staff for higher methadone dosages, methods for triangulating staff members and instigating or exacer-bating conflicts between them, and so forth. Some of these are described in Chapter 16. As they came to light with AFP cases, or within AFP team meetings, they were responded to and corrected by DDTC staff, thus allowing improvement in the overall drug-treatment
program.
THE RESEARCH ETHIC

It is important to mention some significant aspects of the DDTC that


contributed immeasurably to the success of this work. Because the

DDTC (1) was established partly as a research center, (2) was


*This sequence of clinical research impacting positively on clinical procedures had happened before the AFP and has recurred since. It presents an interesting example of the interplay between treatment and research.
somewhat less vulnerable to severe viscissitudes of funding (compared to many other agencies), and (3) incorporated many treatment modali-ties within its walls, it was (and is) a very result-oriented institution. The treatment philosophy was not rigid, and there was a sincere interest in alternatives to methadone (in contrast to the total commit-ment to various forms of pharmacological substitution—mentioned in Chapters 1 and 6—that sometimes occurs in drug-abuse programs). This pragmatism fostered a kind of "live and let live- attitude toward new kinds of treatment, resulting in an atmosphere in which competi-tiveness between different modalities could be minimized. It is con-ceivable that a program such as the AFP, had it been established within a different context, might have encountered much greater difficulty and that resistance could even have increased as it began to demon-strate effectiveness. This did not occur in the present case.
CONCLUSION
Given the inherent problems that occur when two separate institu-tions collaborate, we feel that the relationship and cooperation that developed around this work was closer to optimal than one can normally expect. Our task was certainly facilitated by common ex-periences shared (prior to the study) by several of the principal figures, and also by the shared institutional affiliations and research interests. On the other hand, some of the problems we faced would not occur in situations where all programmatic components exist within the same administrative, physical, and institutional structure. No doubt there are areas in which the PCGC and DDTC philosophies may never reach assimilation. Nonetheless the marriage seems to have "worked,- and divorce has never been necessary.


JOHN M. VAN DEUSEN/M. DUNCAN STANTON/

BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR

09 Mayıs
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR

Once alcohol has been absorbed and distributed, it has many different effects on the brain and behavior. To a large extent these effects vary with the pattern of drinking. Therefore, we discuss the effects of acute, chronic, and prenatal alcohol exposure separately.
ACUTE EXPOSURE
Effects on Behavior and Physical State


Although the effects that a given dose of alcohol will have on an individ­ual vary considerably, the following table shows the general effects of a range of alcohol doses:
Still, there is often a substantial difference between being impaired and appearing impaired. In one study, trained observers were asked to rate whether a person was intoxicated after drinking. At low blood alcohol con­centrations (about half the legal limit for intoxication), only about 10 per­cent of the drinkers appeared intoxicated, and at very high concentrations (greater than twice the legal limit), all of the drinkers appeared intoxicated. However, only 64 percent of people who had blood alcohol concentrations of 100-150 mg/100 ml (well above the legal limit in most states) were judged to be intoxicated. So, in casual social interactions, many people who are significantly impaired—and who would pose a real threat behind the wheel of a car—may not appear impaired even to trained observers.
Alcohol and Brain Cells

You've probably heard some variation of the following statement: "Every time you take a drink of alcohol you kill ten thousand brain cells." Although it is highly unlikely that anyone would drink enough alcohol in a given sitting to kill brain cells directly, as with many such generaliza­tions there is a grain of truth in the warning.
One way that researchers have tried to determine which brain regions control which behaviors in animals is by destroying, or lesioning, a specific brain region and then testing the animal on a particular behavioral task.

Early in the use of this lesioning technique, some researchers found that if they injected a very high concentration of alcohol into the brain (far higher than would be achieved by a drinking person), the cells in that region would die. There is also another grain of truth in the warning about alcohol and brain cells: chronic, repeated drinking damages and sometimes kills the cells in specific brain areas. And it turns out that it might not take a very long history of heavy drinking to do so. We will address this in the "Chronic Exposure" section of this chapter.
There are fundamentally only two types of actions that a chemical can have on nerve cells—excitatory or inhibitory. That is, a drug can either increase or decrease the probability that a given cell will become active and communicate with the other cells to which it is connected. Alcohol generally depresses this type of communication, or synaptic activity, and thus its actions are similar to those of other sedative drugs, like barbiturates (such as phenobarbital) and benzodiazepines (such as Valium). Despite this general suppression of neuronal activ­ity, however, many people report that alcohol activates or stimulates them, particularly soon after drinking, when the concentration of alcohol in the blood is increasing. Although we don't know exactly why alcohol produces feelings of stimulation, there are a couple of possibilities. First, there is the biphasic action of alcohol. This refers to the fact that at low concentrations alcohol actually activates some nerve cells. As the alcohol concentration increases, however, these same cells decrease their firing rates and their activity becomes sup­pressed. Or it might be that some nerve cells send excitatory signals to the other cells with which they communicate, prompting them to send inhibitory messages, actually suppressing the activity of the next cell in the circuit. So, if alcohol suppresses the activity of one of these "inhibitory" cells, the net effect in the circuit would be one of activa­tion. Whatever the exact mechanism, it appears that there are several ways in which alcohol can have activating as well as suppressing effects on neural circuits.
Effects on Specific Neurotransmitters GABA and Glutamate

For many years it was generally thought that alcohol treated all nerve cells equally, simply inhibiting their activity by disturbing the structure of the membrane that surrounds each cell. In this sense the effects of alcohol on the brain were thought to be very nonspecific. However, it is now clear that alcohol has specific and powerful effects on the function of at least two particular types of neuronal receptors: GABA receptors and glutamate receptors. GABA and glutamate are chemical neu­rotransmitters that account for much of the inhibitory and excitatory activity in the brain. When the terminals of one cell release GABA onto GABA receptors on the next cell, that cell becomes less active. When glutamate lands on a glutamate receptor, that cell becomes more active. It is in this way that many circuits in the brain maintain the delicate balance between excitation and inhibition. Small shifts in this balance can change the activity of the circuits and, ultimately, the functioning
of the brain.
Alcohol increases the inhibitory activity of GABA receptors and decreases the excitatory activity of glutamate receptors. These are the two primary ways alcohol suppresses brain activity. While the enhance­ment of GABA activity is probably responsible for many of the general sedating effects of alcohol, the suppression of glutamate activity may have a more specific effect: impairment in the ability to form new memo­ries or think in complex ways while intoxicated. We know that the activ­ity of a particular subtype of glutamate receptor, called the NIVIDA receptor, is very powerfully inhibited by alcohol—even in very low doses. The NMDA receptor is also known to be critical for the formation of new memory. Alcohol's powerful suppression of activity at the NMDA recep­tor may therefore account Mr the memory deficits that people experience after drinking. Dopamine
The neurotransmitter dopamine is known to underlie the rewarding effects of such highly addictive drugs as cocaine and amphetamine. In fact, dopamine is thought to be the main chemical messenger in the reward centers of the brain, which promote the experience of pleasure. Alcohol drinking increases the release of dopamine in these reward cen­ters, probably through the action of GABA neurons, which connect to the dopamine neurons. Studies in animals show that the increase in dopa­mine activity occurs only while the concentration of alcohol in the blood is rising—not while it is falling. So, during the first minutes after drinking the pleasure circuits in the brain are activated, but this "dopamine rush"
disappears after the alcohol level stops rising. This may motivate the drinker to consume more alcohol to start the pleasure sequence again—"chasing the high." The problem is that although the dopamine rush is over, there is still plenty of alcohol in the body. Continued drink­ing in pursuit of the pleasure signals could push the blood alcohol con­centration up to dangerous levels.

Effects on Memory


One of the most common experiences people report after drinking is a failure to remember accurately what happened "the night before." In more extreme cases, after heavy drinking, people often report that whole chunks of time simply appear to be blank, with no memory at all having been recorded. This type of memory impairment is often called a "blackout." (Less extreme versions of this type of memory loss have been called "brown outs" or "gray outs," in which the person may have only very hazy or incomplete memory for the events that occurred during the period of intoxication. In these instances, and even in black­outs, the drinker may remember more about events when reminded of them.) In the past, blackouts were thought to be relatively rare and were viewed as a strong indicator of alcoholism by many clinicians. However, it turns out that blackouts are far more common than previously thought and don't just occur in people with serious alcohol problems. Researchers are now beginning to look more closely at how and when blackouts occur, and there appear to be some disturbing trends. First of all, blackouts appear to be quite frequent among college students, with as many as 40 percent reporting them. But it's not just the memory loss that's disturbing--it's what happens during the periods for which no new memories are made. In one survey, students reported that after a night of heavy drinking they later learned about sexual activity, fights with friends, and driving, for which they had no memory at all. So it seems that blackouts may well be a serious health risk over and above the direct effects that alcohol has on the brain. Sadly, many people joke about blackouts as an embarrassingly funny result of heavy drinking. But they are no joke. Think about it this way: anything that impairs brain function enough to interrupt memory formation is very danger­ous. If it were a blow to the head, exposure to a toxic chemical, or a buildup of pressure in the brain that caused the blackout, it would be taken very seriously. Alcohol-induced blackouts should be taken seriously as well. Short of blackouts, though, it is also clear that alcohol impairs the ability to form new memories even after relatively low doses. Therefore, having a couple of beers while studying for an exam or pre­paring for a presentation at work is probably not a good strategy. The alcohol may promote relaxation, but it will also compromise learning and memory.

Hangover

One of the best-known symptoms of a hangover is a pounding head­ache. The cause is not exactly clear, but it is probably related to the effects of alcohol on blood vessels and fluid balances in the body. In any case, it is much easier to prevent the onset of pain than it is to relieve the pain once it has started. Therefore, the sooner a pain reliever is taken, the better. Some people take one before going to bed after a night of drinking. This way the chemicals in the pain reliever can prevent the pain signals in the brain from getting started as the alcohol is elimi­nated from the body. However, Tylenol (acetaminophen) should not be taken to treat a hangover because it can interact in a very dangerous way with alcohol and its by-products and damage the liver in some peo­ple. Aspirin or ibuprofen can be used instead, but both of these drugs can irritate the stomach and small intestine and together with alcohol may cause gastric upset.
The upset stomach and nausea associated with a hangover are harder to deal with. These may be caused by the toxic by-products of alcohol elimi­nation, irritation to the stomach, or both. No medicines treat these effects specifically. Rather, the best strategy is to eat foods that are gentle on the stomach and to drink plenty of fluids. Morning coffee may help to start the day after a night on the town, but its irritating effects on the stomach may make it an unpleasant waking. And because caffeine is a diuretic, it may also contribute to the dehydration that often accompanies alcohol drinking.

CYNTHİA KUHN