RESTRUCTURING etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
RESTRUCTURING etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

RESTRUCTURING

08 Haziran
RESTRUCTURING


The most basic restructuring move in this therapy—and one empha-sized repeatedly in this volume—is to get the parents or parent surrogates to work together vis-a-vis the addict. If this is not done, the basic triadic conflictual pattern between the IP and parents will persist and treatment will probably fail.
In addition to obtaining parental consensus on goals, there are other restructuring moves that can be implemented, often concomi-tantly. A number of these are demonstrated in the succeeding chapters. Usually they are used as intermediate moves en route to getting the parents to work together more directly. For instance, Haley" (see also Chapter 7) and the Milan group136 often have parents alternate in taking responsibility for the problem person; for example, each parent takes charge for a given period such as a week, or they rotate between odd and even days during the same week. We have not applied this method with any regularity in our work with addicts' families, but it is an option worthy of further exploration.
In cases where, for example, a mother and son are overinvolved, a common strategy is to get the father to take charge of the son (see Chapters 7 and 10). This requires that father and son relate differently in some way, and such an experience must usually be engineered within a session before it can be generalized to the home situation. It may be possible to get them engaged in discussing some common interest, such as work, fishing, and so forth. The mother should be present during this exchange and may need the therapist's subtle support while her husband and son are engaged. For instance, the therapist might sit next to her, keep her from interfering in the father-son interaction, and quietly comfort her with statements such


as, "They need this [talking together"- or, -You know, you are right.

They don't get enough time to talk together as father and son.-
Other tactics may also be used, depending on the specific clinical situation. When it appears that the mother endorses the drug be-havior of the IP, with the father consistently more punitive, it may be possible to force the mother to deal with the negative behavior of the abuser, thus breaking the alliance with him. Alternatively, the thera-pist may meet only with the parents to formulate a strategy to which both parents will adhere.
Another approach is to shift the roles of the parents to, for example, either those of grandparents (rather than overinvolved parents), or of parents to any younger children they might have ("You can let him go because you have these other kids to worry about"). Further, if the parents are retired or near retirement (Chapter 11), the therapist may want to work with them on planning this stage
of their lives.
Because of the nature of the AFP research design, most of our work has been with families in which two adults of different sex were involved, either as parents or in quasi-parental roles. In cases where only one parent is available—usually the mother—the process differs somewhat.'" Here, the therapist may temporarily have to fill a parental role toward the IP, and at other times must assume an almost spouse-like role toward the parent. Often the latter is a way of substituting for the pseudospouse role that has been played by the abuser. The next step is to develop alternative structures and supports for the parent through inclusion of relatives, friends, and so on—in other words, to establish or strengthen the natural support system. In this way the parent will be less dependent on the IP and able to move toward greater disengagement, while the therapist will also be able to gradually disengage. When applicable, another approach is to help the parent get a job or develop more outside activities. Still another, stated above, is to transfer some of the attention from the IP to any younger siblings remaining in the family. Again, joining with the parent is a crucial part of the process, and under no conditions should the therapist become engaged in a direct power struggle with the parent over separation with the IP.