STRUCTURAL AND STRATEGIC FAMILY THERAPY

02 Haziran
STRUCTURAL AND STRATEGIC FAMILY THERAPY
FAMILY THERAPY

The theoretical and operational facets of our therapy are derived primarily from structural family therapy and certain aspects of strategic therapy.* While there are differences between these ap-proaches, they also share certain commonalities. As a rule, both schools subscribe to the following view of the family or couple:
1.      People are seen as interacting within a context—both affecting it and being affected by it.
2.      The family life cycle and developmental stage are im-portant both in diagnosis and in defining therapy strategy—a problem family being seen as stuck at a particular stage in its development.
3.    Symptoms are both system-maintained and system-main-taining.


4.  The family or couple can change, allowing new behaviors to emerge, if the overall context is changed. Further, in order for individual change to occur, the interpersonal system itself must change. This would permit different aspects of such family members' (potential) -character- to come to the fore.

Both schools also regard therapy and the therapist in the follow-ing ways:
1.      Treatment is viewed pragmatically, with an eye toward what -works.-
2.      Emphasis is on the present rather than the past.
3.      Repetitive behavioral sequences are to be changed.
4.      While structural therapists may not be as symptom-focused as strategic therapists, both are much more symptom-oriented than psychodynamic therapists.
5.      Process is emphasized much more than content. This includes interventions that are nonverbal and noncognitive—in a sense, -doing away with words.- Such interventions are derived from viewing the system from a -meta- level and recognizing that verbalizations, per se, by therapist or family are often not necessary for change.
6.   The therapist should direct the therapy and take re-sponsibility for change.
7.   Diagnosis is obtained through hypothesizing, interven-ing, and examining feedback.
8.  Therapeutic contracts, which relate to the problem and the goals of change, are negotiated with clients.
9.  Interpretation is usually employed to "relabel- or re-frame- rather than to produce -insight.-
10.    Behavioral tasks (homework) are routinely assigned.
11.    Considerable effort may go into -joining" the family positively and reducing apparent -guilt- or defensiveness. This is more than simply -establishing rapport,- as it is often done selectively with particular family members and in line with specific therapeutic goals.
12.    Therapy cannot usually progress from the initial dys-functional stage to a "cure- stage without one or more inter-mediate stages, which, on the surface, may appear dysfunctional also. For instance, a therapist may have to take sides with a spouse, thereby "unbalancing- the couple in a way opposite from which it entered treatment, in order to restabilize at a point of equality.
13.    Therapy tends to be brief and typically does not exceed 6 months.
It may be apparent that some of these points are shared by other, more active interpersonal therapies also, such as the behavioral and  -communications training- approaches. However, most of them are distinctive of structural and strategic therapy.

Artikel Terkait

Next Article
« Prev Post
Previous Article
Next Post »

Disqus
Tambahkan komentar Anda

Hiç yorum yok